The corporate media continues to ignore actual ballots casts in the early voting for the 2010 midterms and instead continue to engage in endless discussions about polls. I do not get it? If you are a jury during a trial, which is more important to analyze? A) Hypotheticals or B) Actual evidence captured by the police against the defendent?
The data that have been released thus far in early voting, shows Democrats voting in the same or more percentages in these early voting states. Could it be that the corporate media refuses to actually start analyzing the actual ballots cast because the results thus far do not favor the Republicans? And this early voting data does not fit the corporate media narrative about the midterms that they have been deligently promoting for the last several months?
No comments:
Post a Comment